-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(er): fix broken exception ID asserts #11869
Conversation
The changes in #11772 broke ER tests that were relying on the old exception ID tag. The rerun mechanism made the test pass on re-run so the failure was not caught and the change was merged. Only the tests were impacted, there was no impact on user-facing functionalities.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 87 Passed, 1468 Skipped, 3m 59.97s Total duration (35m 22.06s time saved) |
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2025-01-07 16:17:55 Comparing candidate commit ca1e34d in PR branch Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 393 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. scenario:iast_aspects-ospathjoin_aspect
|
The changes in #11772 broke ER tests that were relying on the old exception ID tag. The rerun mechanism made the test pass on re-run so the failure was not caught and the change was merged. Only the tests were impacted, there was no impact on user-facing functionalities. ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit a225334)
Backport a225334 from #11869 to 2.19. The changes in #11772 broke ER tests that were relying on the old exception ID tag. The rerun mechanism made the test pass on re-run so the failure was not caught and the change was merged. Only the tests were impacted, there was no impact on user-facing functionalities. ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Co-authored-by: Gabriele N. Tornetta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Taegyun Kim <[email protected]>
The changes in #11772 broke ER tests that were relying on the old exception ID tag. The rerun mechanism made the test pass on re-run so the failure was not caught and the change was merged. Only the tests were impacted, there was no impact on user-facing functionalities.
Checklist
Reviewer Checklist