Fix failing tests in CI (#1829)

Co-authored-by: ci.datadog-api-spec <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot] <54105614+api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
DataDog · May 20, 2024 · 56697c8 · 56697c8
1 parent 1a24e18
commit 56697c8
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 9 changed files with 23 additions and 23 deletions.
diff --git a/.apigentools-info b/.apigentools-info
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-05-17 20:25:17.670535",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "77064b00"
+            "regenerated": "2024-05-20 18:10:23.565068",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "6340fda5"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-05-17 20:25:17.688122",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "77064b00"
+            "regenerated": "2024-05-20 18:10:23.583452",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "6340fda5"
         }
     }
 }
diff --git a/...ttes/features/v2/security_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-returns-OK-response.frozen b/...ttes/features/v2/security_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-returns-OK-response.frozen
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2024-05-10T16:34:35.792Z
+2024-05-20T17:07:03.155Z
diff --git a/cassettes/features/v2/security_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-returns-OK-response.yml b/cassettes/features/v2/security_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-returns-OK-response.yml
diff --git a/...y_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-with-an-exclusion-query-returns-OK-response.frozen b/...y_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-with-an-exclusion-query-returns-OK-response.frozen
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2024-05-10T16:34:36.621Z
+2024-05-20T17:07:12.131Z
diff --git a/...rity_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-with-an-exclusion-query-returns-OK-response.yml b/...rity_monitoring/Create-a-suppression-rule-with-an-exclusion-query-returns-OK-response.yml
diff --git a/examples/v2/security-monitoring/CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression.rb b/examples/v2/security-monitoring/CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
     attributes: DatadogAPIClient::V2::SecurityMonitoringSuppressionCreateAttributes.new({
       description: "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.",
       enabled: true,
-      expiration_date: 1703187336000,
+      expiration_date: 1638443471000,
       name: "Example-Security-Monitoring",
       rule_query: "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail",
       suppression_query: "env:staging status:low",

diff --git a/examples/v2/security-monitoring/CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression_3192265332.rb b/examples/v2/security-monitoring/CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression_3192265332.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
     attributes: DatadogAPIClient::V2::SecurityMonitoringSuppressionCreateAttributes.new({
       description: "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.",
       enabled: true,
-      expiration_date: 1703187336000,
+      expiration_date: 1638443471000,
       name: "Example-Security-Monitoring",
       rule_query: "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail",
       data_exclusion_query: "account_id:12345",

diff --git a/features/v1/synthetics.feature b/features/v1/synthetics.feature
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Feature: Synthetics
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/synthetics-app
+  @replay-only @team:DataDog/synthetics-app
   Scenario: Create a private location returns "OK" response
     Given there is a valid "role" in the system
     And new "CreatePrivateLocation" request

diff --git a/features/v2/security_monitoring.feature b/features/v2/security_monitoring.feature
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Feature: Security Monitoring
   @skip-validation @team:DataDog/k9-cloud-security-platform
   Scenario: Create a suppression rule returns "OK" response
     Given new "CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression" request
-    And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.", "enabled": true, "expiration_date": 1703187336000, "name": "{{ unique }}", "rule_query": "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail", "suppression_query": "env:staging status:low"}, "type": "suppressions"}}
+    And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.", "enabled": true, "expiration_date": {{ timestamp('now + 21d') }}000, "name": "{{ unique }}", "rule_query": "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail", "suppression_query": "env:staging status:low"}, "type": "suppressions"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
     And the response "data.type" is equal to "suppressions"
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Feature: Security Monitoring
   @skip-validation @team:DataDog/k9-cloud-security-platform
   Scenario: Create a suppression rule with an exclusion query returns "OK" response
     Given new "CreateSecurityMonitoringSuppression" request
-    And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.", "enabled": true, "expiration_date": 1703187336000, "name": "{{ unique }}", "rule_query": "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail", "data_exclusion_query": "account_id:12345"}, "type": "suppressions"}}
+    And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"description": "This rule suppresses low-severity signals in staging environments.", "enabled": true, "expiration_date": {{ timestamp('now + 21d') }}000, "name": "{{ unique }}", "rule_query": "type:log_detection source:cloudtrail", "data_exclusion_query": "account_id:12345"}, "type": "suppressions"}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
     And the response "data.type" is equal to "suppressions"