-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add deployOperator
option to the AWS kind E2E environment
#31136
Conversation
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 51850358 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: c20f874 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.56 | [+0.46, +0.66] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.04 | [-0.05, +0.14] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.61, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.66, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.92, +0.92] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.95, +0.94] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.13, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.92, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.05 | [-0.18, +0.08] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.52, +0.40] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.09 | [-0.86, +0.69] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.14 | [-0.93, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.20 | [-0.24, -0.16] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -3.32 | [-4.03, -2.60] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -4.96 | [-8.27, -1.66] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 8/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
❌ Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 8/10 replicas passed. Failed 2 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
e94fa16
to
e6c3f90
Compare
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51850358 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit ebe3db6 |
deployOperator
option to the AWS kind E2E environment
…or-example # Conflicts: # .gitlab/common/test_infra_version.yml # test/new-e2e/go.mod # test/new-e2e/go.sum
b049e48
to
bcad91f
Compare
…or-example # Conflicts: # test/new-e2e/pkg/provisioners/aws/kubernetes/kind.go
e9be449
to
eb4b9af
Compare
5f2091b
to
42c23d7
Compare
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
deployOperator
option to the AWS kind provisionerMotivation
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes