Skip to content

Fix koji proxy group member concurrent issue, use API to update member instead of override #2507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
yma955 merged 2 commits into from
Sep 2, 2025
Merged

Fix koji proxy group member concurrent issue, use API to update member instead of override #2507

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d84703a
Fix koji proxy group member concurrent issue, use API to update membe…
yma955 Aug 26, 2025
8ad742a
Abandon original group update with new memeber call logic
yma955 Aug 28, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions ...ji/common/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/koji/content/KojiContentManagerDecorator.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ private Group adjustTargetGroup( final RemoteRepository buildRepo, final Group s
+ buildRepo.getMetadata( NVR ) );

storeDataManager.storeArtifactStore( targetGroup, changeSummary, false, true, new EventMetadata() );
// Use repo service API to append the member of group instead of to override during target group update.
storeDataManager.addConstituentToGroup( targetGroup.getKey(), buildRepo.getKey() );
Copy link
Member

@sswguo sswguo Aug 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we have the addConstituentToGroup, is the above storeArtifactStore still needed ?

Copy link
Member Author

@yma955 yma955 Aug 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sswguo I just re-read this part, and yes, it seems the original logic is only focused on group update with a new member, so I annotated, and updated 8ad742a

Copy link
Member

@sswguo sswguo Aug 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that's what we discussed earlier, to replace that part with the specific endpoint.

}
catch ( IndyDataException e )
{
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions api/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/data/StoreDataManager.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ Set<Group> affectedBy( Collection<StoreKey> keys )

Set<Group> filterAffectedGroups( Set<Group> affectedGroups );

void addConstituentToGroup( StoreKey key, StoreKey member );

class ContextualTask
{
private String threadName;
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions db/common/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/db/common/AbstractStoreDataManager.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -681,4 +681,7 @@ public boolean isExcludedGroup( Group group )
String filter = indyConfiguration.getAffectedGroupsExcludeFilter();
return isNotBlank( filter ) && group.getName().matches( filter );
}

@Override
public abstract void addConstituentToGroup( StoreKey key, StoreKey member );
}
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions ...inispan/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/infinispan/data/InfinispanStoreDataManager.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -344,4 +344,9 @@ public void initByPkgMap()
keys.add( store.getKey() );
}
}

@Override
public void addConstituentToGroup( StoreKey key, StoreKey member )
{
}
}
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions db/memory/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/mem/data/MemoryStoreDataManager.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -180,4 +180,8 @@ protected ArtifactStore putArtifactStoreInternal( StoreKey storeKey, ArtifactSto
return stores.put( storeKey, store );
}

@Override
public void addConstituentToGroup( StoreKey key, StoreKey member )
{
}
}
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion db/service/src/main/java/org/commonjava/indy/db/service/ServiceStoreDataManager.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
import static java.util.Collections.emptyMap;
import static java.util.Collections.emptySet;
import static org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils.isBlank;
import static org.commonjava.indy.db.common.StoreUpdateAction.STORE;
import static org.commonjava.indy.model.core.ArtifactStore.METADATA_CHANGELOG;
import static org.commonjava.indy.model.core.StoreType.hosted;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -492,4 +491,16 @@ protected void removeAffectedStore( StoreKey key )
logger.debug( "Do nothing here. Delegate to repository service for further operations." );
}

@Override
public void addConstituentToGroup( StoreKey key, StoreKey member )
{
try
{
client.module( IndyStoresClientModule.class ).addConstituentToGroup( key, member );
}
catch ( IndyClientException e )
{
logger.error( "Failed to add member {} into Group {}, due to: {}", member, key, e.getMessage() );
}
}
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pom.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@

<!-- commonjava/redhat projects -->
<indyModelVersion>1.5</indyModelVersion>
<indyClientVersion>3.4.0</indyClientVersion>
<indyClientVersion>3.4.4-SNAPSHOT</indyClientVersion>
<atlasVersion>1.1.4</atlasVersion>
<galleyVersion>1.20</galleyVersion>
<weftVersion>1.24</weftVersion>
Expand Down
Loading