Skip to content
Open
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions Sprint-2/debug/address.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
// Predict and explain first...

// This code should log out the houseNumber from the address object
// but it isn't working...
// Fix anything that isn't working

const address = {
houseNumber: 42,
street: "Imaginary Road",
Expand All @@ -12,4 +10,10 @@ const address = {
postcode: "XYZ 123",
};

console.log(`My house number is ${address[0]}`);
// console.log(`My house number is ${address[0]}`);
// is trying to access a property using address[0] and address is an object, not an array.
// it will log undefined.
// to access the houseNumber property, we should use dot notation or bracket notation with string,and either
// way using object.key or object["key"]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work @shreefAhmedM!
I think we can simplify the comment a bit.

console.log(`My house number is ${address.houseNumber}`);
console.log(`My house number is ${address["houseNumber"]}`);
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion Sprint-2/debug/author.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ const author = {
alive: true,
};

for (const value of author) {
// for (const value of author) {
// console.log(value);
// }
// It will log syntax Error because Objects themselves aren’t directly iterable Unlike arrays we need to converted
// and then we can loop

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good explanation — you clearly identified why the original loop didn't work and how to resolve it. @shreefAhmedM


for (const value of Object.values(author)) {
console.log(value);
}
14 changes: 10 additions & 4 deletions Sprint-2/debug/recipe.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,13 +3,19 @@
// This program should log out the title, how many it serves and the ingredients.
// Each ingredient should be logged on a new line
// How can you fix it?

const recipe = {
title: "bruschetta",
serves: 2,
ingredients: ["olive oil", "tomatoes", "salt", "pepper"],
};

console.log(`${recipe.title} serves ${recipe.serves}
ingredients:
${recipe}`);
// console.log(`${recipe.title} serves ${recipe.serves}
// ingredients:
// ${recipe}`);
// When you using ${recipe} in a template literal javaScript tries to convert the entire object to a string
// it will log [object Object].
console.log(`${recipe.title} serves ${recipe.serves}`);
console.log("ingredients");
recipe.ingredients.forEach((ingredient) => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using forEach is a clean and readable way to loop through the ingredients. Good choice.

console.log(ingredient);
});
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions Sprint-2/implement/contains.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
function contains() {}

function contains(obj, prop) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shreefAhmedM we can make the argument prop more descriptive

return obj && typeof obj === "object" && prop in obj;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that you safeguard against non-object inputs by checking typeof obj === "object". It makes the function more robust and prevents errors when unexpected values are passed in.

}
// console.log(contains(({ a: 1, b: 2 }, "c")));
module.exports = contains;
19 changes: 15 additions & 4 deletions Sprint-2/implement/contains.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,20 +16,31 @@ as the object doesn't contains a key of 'c'
// Given a contains function
// When passed an object and a property name
// Then it should return true if the object contains the property, false otherwise
test("contains returns true for existing property", () => {
expect(contains({ a: 1, b: 2 }, "a")).toBe(true);
});

// Given an empty object
// When passed to contains
// Then it should return false
test.todo("contains on empty object returns false");

test("contains on empty object returns false", () => {
expect(contains({}, "a")).toBe(false);
});
// Given an object with properties
// When passed to contains with an existing property name
// Then it should return true

test("Given an object with an existing property should return true", () => {
expect(contains({ a: 1, k: 2 }, "k")).toBe(true);
});
// Given an object with properties
// When passed to contains with a non-existent property name
// Then it should return false

test("Given an object with none-existing property should return false", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very Good!

expect(contains({ a: 1, b: 2 }, "c")).toBe(false);
});
// Given invalid parameters like an array
// When passed to contains
// Then it should return false or throw an error
test("Given an object with an existing property should return true", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shreefAhmedM Good test — small mismatch: the acceptance criteria describe invalid parameters (like an array), but the test title says it's testing an object with an existing property.

expect(contains(["k", "a"], "k")).toBe(false);
});
16 changes: 13 additions & 3 deletions Sprint-2/implement/lookup.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
function createLookup() {
// implementation here
function createLookup(nestedArr) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job — this works and produces the correct result! 👍
One suggestion: flattening the array isn’t necessary here, since the input is already a 2D array of [country, currency] pairs.
We can make the implementation simpler by iterating directly over each pair and assigning the key-value in the object. This keeps the code readable and avoids potential issues with unexpected nested arrays.

const noneNesArr = nestedArr.flat(Infinity);
const result = {};
for (let i = 0; i < noneNesArr.length; i += 2) {
const country = noneNesArr[i];
const currency = noneNesArr[i + 1];
result[country] = currency;
}
return result;
}

createLookup([

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don’t need to call createLookup here in the module. The tests will call it with the required inputs

["US", "USD"],
["CA", "CAD"],
]);
module.exports = createLookup;
54 changes: 21 additions & 33 deletions Sprint-2/implement/lookup.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,35 +1,23 @@
const createLookup = require("./lookup.js");

test.todo("creates a country currency code lookup for multiple codes");

/*
Create a lookup object of key value pairs from an array of code pairs
Acceptance Criteria:
Given
- An array of arrays representing country code and currency code pairs
e.g. [['US', 'USD'], ['CA', 'CAD']]
When
- createLookup function is called with the country-currency array as an argument
Then
- It should return an object where:
- The keys are the country codes
- The values are the corresponding currency codes
Example
Given: [['US', 'USD'], ['CA', 'CAD']]
When
createLookup(countryCurrencyPairs) is called
Then
It should return:
{
'US': 'USD',
'CA': 'CAD'
}
*/
// Create a lookup object of key value pairs from an array of code pairs

// Acceptance Criteria:

// Given
// - An array of arrays representing country code and currency code pairs
// e.g. [['US', 'USD'], ['CA', 'CAD']]
test("creates a country currency code lookup for multiple codes", () => {
expect(
createLookup([
["US", "USD"],
["CA", "CAD"],
])
).toEqual({ US: "USD", CA: "CAD" });
});

test("creates a country currency code with mixed nesting and extra layers lookup for multiple codes", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good thinking outside the box! 👏 But this test with extra nested arrays isn’t part of the requirement — the function only needs to handle a simple array of [country, currency] pairs.

expect(
createLookup([["US", "USD"], [["CA", "CAD"]], [[["JP", "JPY"]]]])
).toEqual({ US: "USD", CA: "CAD", JP: "JPY" });
});
14 changes: 11 additions & 3 deletions Sprint-2/implement/querystring.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,14 +3,22 @@ function parseQueryString(queryString) {
if (queryString.length === 0) {
return queryParams;
}

const keyValuePairs = queryString.split("&");

for (const pair of keyValuePairs) {
const [key, value] = pair.split("=");
queryParams[key] = value;
const indexOfEquals = pair.indexOf("=");

if (indexOfEquals === -1) {
queryParams[pair] = "";
} else {
const key = pair.slice(0, indexOfEquals);
const value = pair.slice(indexOfEquals + 1);
queryParams[key] = value;
}
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! ✅ This handles values containing = correctly and covers keys with no value.

return queryParams;
}

console.log(parseQueryString("equation=x=y+1"));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to call parseQueryString in this module or can we let the tests handle calling it with different inputs?

module.exports = parseQueryString;
36 changes: 33 additions & 3 deletions Sprint-2/implement/querystring.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,10 +3,40 @@
// Below is one test case for an edge case the implementation doesn't handle well.
// Fix the implementation for this test, and try to think of as many other edge cases as possible - write tests and fix those too.

const parseQueryString = require("./querystring.js")

const parseQueryString = require("./querystring.js");
test("parses querystring values containing =", () => {
expect(parseQueryString("equation=x=y+1")).toEqual({
"equation": "x=y+1",
equation: "x=y+1",
});
});
test("parses simple key=value pairs", () => {
expect(parseQueryString("name=John&age=30")).toEqual({
name: "John",
age: "30",
});
});

test("parses value containing '='", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests "parses value containing '='” and "parses querystring values containing =" are very similar.

expect(parseQueryString("equation=x=y+1")).toEqual({
equation: "x=y+1",
});
});

test("handles keys with no value", () => {
expect(parseQueryString("flag&key=value")).toEqual({
flag: "",
key: "value",
});
});

test("handles multiple '=' in value", () => {
expect(parseQueryString("data=key=value=extra")).toEqual({
data: "key=value=extra",
});
});

test("handles keys with empty values", () => {
expect(parseQueryString("name=")).toEqual({
name: "",
});
});
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions Sprint-2/implement/tally.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
function tally() {}

function tally(arr) {
const output = {};
if (!Array.isArray(arr)) {
throw new Error("Input must be an array");
}
arr.forEach((element) => {
output[element] = (output[element] || 0) + 1;
});
return output;
}
module.exports = tally;
14 changes: 12 additions & 2 deletions Sprint-2/implement/tally.test.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,16 +19,26 @@ const tally = require("./tally.js");
// Given a function called tally
// When passed an array of items
// Then it should return an object containing the count for each unique item

test("Given a function tally(['a']), target output should be { a: 1 }", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test title and implementation don’t align.

expect(tally(["a", "a", "a"])).toEqual({ a: 3 });
});
// Given an empty array
// When passed to tally
// Then it should return an empty object
test.todo("tally on an empty array returns an empty object");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test.todo is only a placeholder. Once you implement the real test for an empty array, you can remove this line.


test("tally on an empty array returns an empty object, target output should be {}", () => {
expect(tally([])).toEqual({});
});
// Given an array with duplicate items
// When passed to tally
// Then it should return counts for each unique item
test("Given a function tally(['a']), target output should be { a: 1 }", () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can make the test name align with the test requirement

expect(tally(["a", "a", "b", "c"])).toEqual({ a: 2, b: 1, c: 1 });
});

// Given an invalid input like a string
// When passed to tally
// Then it should throw an error
test("Given an invalid input like a string,Then it should throw an error", () => {
expect(() => tally("string")).toThrow("Input must be an array");
});
15 changes: 10 additions & 5 deletions Sprint-2/interpret/invert.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,20 +10,25 @@ function invert(obj) {
const invertedObj = {};

for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj)) {
invertedObj.key = value;
invertedObj[value] = key;
}

return invertedObj;
}

// a) What is the current return value when invert is called with { a : 1 }

// {"1":"a"}
// b) What is the current return value when invert is called with { a: 1, b: 2 }

// { "1": "a", "2": "b" }
// c) What is the target return value when invert is called with {a : 1, b: 2}

// { a: 1, b: 2 }
// c) What does Object.entries return? Why is it needed in this program?
// returns an array of a given object's which is own enumerable string-keyed property key-value pairs.

// d) Explain why the current return value is different from the target output

// The code uses invertedObj.key = value which creates a property literally named "key" instead of dynamically using the value of key
// e) Fix the implementation of invert (and write tests to prove it's fixed!)
console.log(invert({ a: 2, b: 3 })); // ===> { '2': 'a', '3': 'b' }
console.log(invert({ b: 1, c: 2 })); // ===> { '1': 'b', '2': 'c' }
console.log(invert({ code: "war" })); // ===> { war: 'code'
console.log(invert({})); // ===> {}
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions Sprint-2/stretch/count-words.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,3 +26,17 @@
3. Order the results to find out which word is the most common in the input
*/
function countWords(str) {
const obj = {};
let tidyStr = str.replace(/[!"#$%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?@[\]^_`{|}~]/g, "");
let arr = tidyStr.toLowerCase().split(" ");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just thinking — splitting by " " only handles regular spaces. It won’t handle tabs (\t) or multiple consecutive spaces correctly. Can we think of a way to handle this?

arr.forEach((element) => {
if (obj[element]) {
obj[element] += 1;
} else {
obj[element] = 1;
}
});
return obj;
}
// countWords("you and mE anD you me! me");
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions Sprint-2/stretch/mode.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,8 +19,11 @@ function calculateMode(list) {

freqs.set(num, (freqs.get(num) || 0) + 1);
}
return highestFreg(freqs);
}

// Find the value with the highest frequency
// Find the value with the highest frequency
function highestFreg(freqs) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shreefAhmedM Consider renaming highestFreg to highestFreq to fix the typo.

let maxFreq = 0;
let mode;
for (let [num, freq] of freqs) {
Expand All @@ -32,5 +35,4 @@ function calculateMode(list) {

return maxFreq === 0 ? NaN : mode;
}

module.exports = calculateMode;
Loading