Debounce Filter through json config working only for Field not for event https://github.com/COVESA/vsomeip/issues/704

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

Debounce Filter through json config working only for Field not for event BUG #704

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

Hi @GenivivSOMEIPmaintainer - Do you have any plan to take this to master?
Could you please review.

[vmurugap]

@GenivivSOMEIPmaintainer : Could you please review and consider this for master branch if applicable

[duartenfonseca]

@Vignesh-Murugappan can you fix the conflicts? thanks, we will look into this PR

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

@duartenfonseca Conflicts have been resolved!

[zhaoxin39913]

Hi @Vignesh-Murugappan, thanks for getting it fixed. Can we have it available in 3.5.2 or next release ?

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

@zhaoxin39913 Yeah sure, please take it for 3.5.2

Thanks!

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

@zhaoxin39913 @duartenfonseca Is it possible to take this change for 3.5.3 or next release?

[Vignesh-Murugappan]

@zhaoxin39913 @duartenfonseca is it possible to take this PR in next release?

[duartenfonseca]

@Vignesh-Murugappan isn't this network test https://github.com/COVESA/vsomeip/tree/master/test/network_tests/debounce_filter_tests a case of filtering an event?
can you demonstrate from that test what you would like to be able to do with the debounce filter?

[zhaoxin39913]

Hi @duartenfonseca

can we have this patch in next offical release (eg. 3.5.4) ?

[duartenfonseca]

Hi @duartenfonseca

can we have this patch in next offical release (eg. 3.5.4) ?

@zhaoxin39913 I was not able to reproduce the issue this fixes, can you help on this?

[duartenfonseca]

@Vignesh-Murugappan / @zhaoxin39913
I was able to understand now the issue, if the vsomeip::event_type_e is ET_FIELD this functionality works, but when you change the type to ET_EVENT, it supposedly is not working.
The problem however is that in the network test that i mentioned previously (https://github.com/COVESA/vsomeip/tree/master/test/network_tests/debounce_filter_tests), if you change the mentions of ET_FIELD the test still filters correctly.
Can you try this approach on your side?