-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Cruise Controller FLC refactored using PID #36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
T2Fat2Fly
wants to merge
1
commit into
Boris-Barboris:master
Choose a base branch
from
T2Fat2Fly:FLC-Refactoring
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a fan of infinities here. If the controller's output is logically bound to [-90; 90], we can dynamically choose some sane clamp value (derived from current KI value). If not, crafts that are very very fat and approach desired climb angle very slowly, may end up with an enormous accumulator value that will cause FLC to overshoot.
Set some limit. It needs not to be rigorous or universal, but it should be some sane number.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH I have trouble understanding these clamps (sorry I'm (very!) new to the industrial controllers).
If I understand correctly, the IntergralClamp is used to filter out inputs that is off the setpoint too much. But this is not the case where actual airspeed can be anywhere, regardless of where the setpoint is. So I set it to infinity.
For the AccumulatorClamp, you are right about it should be clamped. Maybe setting it to
1.0 / KIjust like you did it in the thrust PID controller? I still have no idea about how to tweak this value.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would try:
accumulator clamp = 90.0 / KI
AccumulDerivClamp = 2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IntegralClamp as infinity should probably be fine