Skip to content

feat(jurisdicciones): ficha inicial de Tucuman con fuentes oficiales verificadas (#4) - #31

Open
blippip69 wants to merge 1 commit into
Bitcoindefi:mainfrom
blippip69:feat/jurisdiccion-tucuman
Open

feat(jurisdicciones): ficha inicial de Tucuman con fuentes oficiales verificadas (#4)#31
blippip69 wants to merge 1 commit into
Bitcoindefi:mainfrom
blippip69:feat/jurisdiccion-tucuman

Conversation

@blippip69

Copy link
Copy Markdown

feat(jurisdicciones): ficha de Tucumán (#4)

ES

Agrega jurisdicciones/tucuman.md con la estructura de las fichas existentes.

Verificado en fuente primaria (sitio oficial del Poder Judicial de Tucumán):

  • CPCCT Ley 6176 — texto consolidado PDF oficial con todas las modificatorias (8968/2017, 9227/2020, 9316/2020, etc.).
  • Nuevo CPCCT Ley 9531 y Nuevo Código Procesal de Familia Ley 9581 (consolidados por Ley 9924, Digesto) — listados oficialmente; vigencia del nuevo CPCCT marcada para confirmar.
  • CPP Ley 8933 — acusatorio, plenamente vigente desde 01-09-2020; transición Ley 9675 (B.O. 19-01-2023) con Período de Resolución de Causas Pendientes hasta 01-09-2026.
  • Acordada 1562/22 + 4 modificatorias (reglamento de expediente digital).

En 🔲: acordada de feria vigente, plazo de gracia local, leyes orgánicas del MP, textos ordenados del CPL (6204) y contencioso.

URLs oficiales (justucuman.gov.ar, Argentina.gob.ar/normativa) accesibles.

EN

Adds jurisdicciones/tucuman.md with the established ficha skeleton: five-fuero table with primary-source verified law numbers from the Poder Judicial's own consolidated texts, the active penal transition regime (until sept-2026) flagged as a case-by-case check, digital-filing plazo rules, and official accessible sources. Unverified items ship as pending markers per CONTRIBUTING rules.

…verificadas (Bitcoindefi#4)

Adds jurisdicciones/tucuman.md: institutional framework (CSJT acordadas incl. expediente digital reglamento 1562/22), five-fuero table with primary-source verified numbers (CPCCT Ley 6176 consolidated text from the Poder Judicial site + new 9531 flagged pending vigencia check, nuevo CPP Ley 8933 in force since 2020 with transition Ley 9675 until sept-2026, familia Ley 9581/9924), plazos notes covering the digital-filing rules and feria/gracia verification slots, SAIJ query syntax, and official sources each tested accessible. Unverified items ship as pending markers per CONTRIBUTING.
Comment thread jurisdicciones/tucuman.md
Comment on lines +3 to +5
> Confirm\u00e1 el fuero antes de computar plazos. Los n\u00fameros de norma marcados `□`
> re-verificalos en SAIJ / Digesto Jur\u00eddico provincial antes de citar. Los n\u00fameros
> sin `□` fueron verificados en fuente primaria (ver "Verificaci\u00f3n" al pie).

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Quality: Pending marker uses '□' instead of repo convention '🔲'

CONTRIBUTING.md establishes '🔲 verificación pendiente' as the (non-negotiable) marker for unverified items, and every other file in the repo uses the emoji 🔲 (71 matches across 16 files, incl. jujuy.md/salta.md/caba-nacional.md). tucuman.md instead uses the plain WHITE SQUARE character '□' (U+25A1) in all 16 spots and zero '🔲'. Any skill, tooling, or human that greps for '🔲' to surface pending items (e.g. the verification/audit skills) will silently miss every pending item in Tucumán. Replace all '□' occurrences with '🔲' to match the established convention.

Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎

@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Code Review ⚠️ Changes requested 0 resolved / 1 findings

Adds the initial Tucuman jurisdiction file with verified official sources, but the pending marker uses '□' instead of the repository convention '🔲'.

⚠️ Quality: Pending marker uses '□' instead of repo convention '🔲'

📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:3-5 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:9 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:14 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:21-24 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:31-33 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:53-58 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:69 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:74 📄 jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:78

CONTRIBUTING.md establishes '🔲 verificación pendiente' as the (non-negotiable) marker for unverified items, and every other file in the repo uses the emoji 🔲 (71 matches across 16 files, incl. jujuy.md/salta.md/caba-nacional.md). tucuman.md instead uses the plain WHITE SQUARE character '□' (U+25A1) in all 16 spots and zero '🔲'. Any skill, tooling, or human that greps for '🔲' to surface pending items (e.g. the verification/audit skills) will silently miss every pending item in Tucumán. Replace all '□' occurrences with '🔲' to match the established convention.

🤖 Prompt for agents
Code Review: Adds the initial Tucuman jurisdiction file with verified official sources, but the pending marker uses '□' instead of the repository convention '🔲'.

1. ⚠️ Quality: Pending marker uses '□' instead of repo convention '🔲'
   Files: jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:3-5, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:9, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:14, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:21-24, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:31-33, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:53-58, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:69, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:74, jurisdicciones/tucuman.md:78

   CONTRIBUTING.md establishes '🔲 verificación pendiente' as the (non-negotiable) marker for unverified items, and every other file in the repo uses the emoji 🔲 (71 matches across 16 files, incl. jujuy.md/salta.md/caba-nacional.md). tucuman.md instead uses the plain WHITE SQUARE character '□' (U+25A1) in all 16 spots and zero '🔲'. Any skill, tooling, or human that greps for '🔲' to surface pending items (e.g. the verification/audit skills) will silently miss every pending item in Tucumán. Replace all '□' occurrences with '🔲' to match the established convention.

Options

Auto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch.
Display: compact → Showing less information.

Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:

Auto-apply Compact
gitar auto-apply:on         
gitar display:verbose         

Important

Your trial ends in 7 days — upgrade now to keep code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more.

Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant