wait flag writeup #28
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Should waiting behavior definition be moved to terms section? |
orbeckst
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me.
From the specs it looks as if you will be able to DISCONNECT and then send a new SESSION_INFO with different settings, which is nice, so that you can initially monitor and then later, once some criteria are fulfilled, decide to now harvest data.
Defining blocking/non-blocking in terms may be something to do in the future.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #
Changes made in this Pull Request:
PR Checklist