Set upper dependency bound (<= 3.4.5) on sphinx-tabs
#64
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm closing this PR since the RTD build that was displaying this issue miraculously started displaying correctly. I'm guessing this might be a browser caching issue. |
|
And the issue came back... 🤦♂️ |
|
Hi, I arrived here from executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#198. At RTD we also saw this problem, it was due to sphinx-hoverxref depending on the old behavior from sphinx-tabs, it should be fixed with readthedocs/sphinx-hoverxref#318. Just letting you know so you can update once the fix is released. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes made in executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#198 are causing the
tabs.cssto not be included when a page is build. I'm currently not sure what the exact culprit is.v3.4.5still properly includes the CSS.For version
>3.4.5the tabs should up as regular html buttons...Instead of...
