Skip to content

Conversation

@havetisyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@havetisyan havetisyan commented Jan 23, 2026

Description

to address issue #3169

Contribution Checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce any breaking changes
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • Create an issue and link to the pull request.

Attach Screenshots (Optional)

Signed-off-by: Henry Avetisyan <hga@yahooinc.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @havetisyan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to improve the maintainability and readability of the InstanceAzureProviderTest suite by consolidating redundant test setup and teardown code. It extracts the logic for configuring system properties and managing temporary files into reusable helper methods, ensuring a consistent and clean testing environment across multiple test cases. This addresses issue #3169 by streamlining the test infrastructure.

Highlights

  • Test Code Refactoring: The pull request refactors repetitive setup and teardown logic in InstanceAzureProviderTest.java into dedicated helper methods.
  • New Helper Methods: Two new private methods, setupProviderSettings and clearProviderSettings, were introduced to encapsulate the configuration and cleanup of system properties and temporary files for Azure provider tests.
  • Improved Test Readability: By abstracting common setup and teardown steps, individual test methods are now cleaner, more concise, and easier to understand.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request does a good job of refactoring duplicated test setup and teardown logic into helper methods, which improves the overall maintainability of the test suite. You've also corrected several tests by ensuring they have the proper setup.

While the goal was to update all test cases, it appears a few were missed, such as testConfirmInstance, testConfirmInstanceProviderConfig, and testConfirmInstanceAudienceMismatch. It would be great to include them in this refactoring effort for consistency.

I've also left a comment on the new helper methods with suggestions to make them more flexible and reusable by parameterizing the hardcoded resource URI and extracting duplicated file paths into constants.

@havetisyan havetisyan merged commit 0a40e0d into master Jan 23, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
@havetisyan havetisyan deleted the fix branch January 23, 2026 06:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants