Skip to content

refactor: inline CTE in fct_orders#11

Open
anandgupta42 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sim/refactor-cte-fct_orders-202603250902
Open

refactor: inline CTE in fct_orders#11
anandgupta42 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sim/refactor-cte-fct_orders-202603250902

Conversation

@anandgupta42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Converted a CTE to an inline subquery in fct_orders.sql for experimentation.

This is a simulated PR for testing altimate-code-actions.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Altimate Code — 1 model validated · 5 downstream safe

What We Checked How Result
Anti-Patterns (26 rules) AST analysis ✅ Clean
Injection Safety (10 rules) Pattern scan ✅ Safe
Breaking Changes Schema compatibility against 5 downstream models ✅ Compatible
📋 Query Profile
fct_orders.sql
Complexity Medium
Tables 2
JOINs 1 (LEFT)
CTEs No
Subqueries Yes
Window Functions No
Aggregation No

📊 Blast Radius — 1 downstream model (4 tests affected)

graph LR
    classDef modified fill:#ff6b6b,stroke:#c92a2a,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
    classDef downstream fill:#ffd43b,stroke:#e67700,color:#333,stroke-width:1px
    classDef exposure fill:#845ef7,stroke:#5f3dc4,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px

    fct_orders["fct_orders"]:::modified --> assert_positive_revenue["assert_positive_revenue"]:::downstream
Loading

🔴 Modified    🟡 Downstream    🟣 Exposure    🧪 4 tests also affected


🔍 Altimate Code v0.4.0 · Validated without hitting your warehouse · Configure · Feedback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant