Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ACS-9297] [ACA] [E2E] Update test IDs to match the XRAY test cases IDs #4429

Draft
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

datguychen
Copy link
Contributor

JIRA ticket link or changeset's description
https://hyland.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-9297

@datguychen datguychen force-pushed the ACS-9297-update-aca-test-ids branch from 85642a3 to 2796c76 Compare March 3, 2025 12:41
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
3.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@AleksanderSklorz
Copy link
Contributor

@datguychen I want to ensure - I can see many e2es which still have old IDs like below:
image

Is that expected?

@datguychen
Copy link
Contributor Author

datguychen commented Mar 4, 2025

@datguychen I want to ensure - I can see many e2es which still have old IDs like below: image

Is that expected?

Some of them, yes. This is a ticket https://hyland.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-9299 that tracks tests without any XRAY test case, so the ID wasn't updated yet. But I also see that I skipped some of them. I will check everything again and add more updates

@AleksanderSklorz
Copy link
Contributor

@datguychen I want to ensure - I can see many e2es which still have old IDs like below: image
Is that expected?

Some of them, yes. This is a ticket https://hyland.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-9299 that tracks tests without any XRAY test case, so the ID wasn't updated yet. But I also see that I skipped some of them. I will check everything again and add more updates

Thanks @datguychen. Please check once again and let me know when it will be ready to re-review

@datguychen datguychen marked this pull request as draft March 4, 2025 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants