Skip to content

Conversation

AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot commented Oct 10, 2025

OpenAPI spec files or templates have been modified on 22-10-2025 by commit.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners October 10, 2025 08:40
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the generated client code to reflect recent changes in the OpenAPI specification. The primary purpose is to synchronize the client with the latest API definitions, incorporating new features related to Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) associations and ensuring overall code quality through consistent formatting and updated tooling practices.

Highlights

  • New SCA Association Models: Introduced several new models related to Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) associations within the balanceplatform package. These include ApproveAssociationRequest, ApproveAssociationResponse, Association, AssociationListing, and AssociationStatus, enabling new functionalities for managing SCA device associations.
  • Code Formatting and Style Updates: Applied extensive reformatting and style adjustments across numerous generated Java model files. This includes reordering imports, standardizing Javadoc comments, adjusting indentation, and refining the implementation of equals, hashCode, and toString methods for consistency.
  • OpenAPI Generator Tooling Updates: Updated core OpenAPI schema handling files like AbstractOpenApiSchema.java and JSON.java across different service packages. These changes reflect updates in the OpenAPI Generator tool, leading to improved code generation consistency and minor structural adjustments.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request appears to be an automated update from a code generator. The changes are mostly stylistic, including indentation and Javadoc formatting. I've identified a recurring issue with malformed Javadoc comments across numerous files, which likely indicates a bug in the generator. I've added specific comments to each affected file to highlight this for correction in future generated code.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 4 times, most recently from 78ac91d to 0a8d40f Compare October 15, 2025 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant