Skip to content

Conversation

Aditya30ag
Copy link
Contributor

@Aditya30ag Aditya30ag commented Jul 15, 2025

Problem

Critical security vulnerability in user signup process allowing email enumeration and potential account lockouts.

Solution

  • Removed insecure user existence check using dummy password
  • Implemented proper error handling during signup process
  • Fixed email enumeration and account lockout vulnerabilities

Security Improvements

  • ✅ Eliminates email enumeration attacks
  • ✅ Prevents potential account lockouts
  • ✅ Uses Supabase built-in error handling
  • ✅ Follows OWASP security best practices

Files Changed

  • Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx

Closes #99

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling during signup to provide a consistent message when an account already exists.
    • Enhanced reliability of the signup process by simplifying logic and reducing redundant loading state changes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The signup logic in Signup.tsx was refactored to remove a previous user existence check using a dummy sign-in attempt. The code now attempts direct signup and handles various "already registered" error messages uniformly. Error logging and loading state management were also improved within the signup flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx Removed dummy sign-in existence check, unified "already registered" error handling, improved error logging, and consolidated loading state logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SignupPage
    participant SupabaseAuth

    User->>SignupPage: Submit signup form
    SignupPage->>SupabaseAuth: signUp(email, password, options)
    alt Success (data.user exists)
        SignupPage->>SignupPage: Log success
        SignupPage->>AuthContext: Navigate on auth state change
    else Error (already registered)
        SignupPage->>SignupPage: Show "account already exists" error
    else Other error
        SignupPage->>SignupPage: Log unexpected error
        SignupPage->>SignupPage: Show generic error
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove dummy sign-in existence check and avoid email enumeration (Issue #99)
Handle "already registered" errors during signup with a user-friendly message (Issue #99)
Improve error handling and avoid information disclosure/account lockouts (Issue #99)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A bunny hopped to signup's door,
No more peeking at emails before!
Errors now handled with gentle care,
No secrets leaked, no need to beware.
With logs and checks all neat and tight,
This signup’s future is looking bright!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx (2)

54-56: Consider adding more comprehensive error message patterns.

The error handling covers the main variants but could be more robust. Supabase might return other variations of "already registered" messages.

Consider using a more comprehensive pattern check:

-        if (error.message.includes("already registered") || 
-            error.message.includes("already exists") ||
-            error.message.includes("already been registered")) {
+        if (error.message.toLowerCase().includes("already") || 
+            error.message.toLowerCase().includes("exists") ||
+            error.message.toLowerCase().includes("duplicate")) {

This approach is more resilient to message variations while maintaining security.


61-61: Optimize loading state management to avoid redundant calls.

The setIsLoading(false) is called in multiple places, which could be simplified by relying on the finally block for cleanup.

Consider this refactor to eliminate redundant calls:

       if (error) {
         // Handle specific error cases
         if (error.message.includes("already registered") || 
             error.message.includes("already exists") ||
             error.message.includes("already been registered")) {
           setError("An account with this email already exists. Please sign in instead.");
         } else {
           setError(error.message);
         }
-        setIsLoading(false);
         return;
       }
       
       // Check if signup was successful
       if (data.user) {
         // User was created successfully
         console.log("User signed up successfully:", data.user);
         // AuthContext will handle navigation based on user onboarding status and role
       }
       
-      setIsLoading(false);
     } catch (err) {
       console.error("Signup error:", err);
       setError("Something went wrong. Please try again.");
     } finally {
       setIsLoading(false);
     }

Also applies to: 72-72, 77-77

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43be1d1 and 6003a61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx (1)
Frontend/src/utils/supabase.tsx (1)
  • supabase (11-11)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx (2)

45-50: Security improvement approved - direct signup approach prevents email enumeration.

The change from checking user existence via dummy sign-in to direct signup is a significant security improvement that aligns with OWASP best practices. This prevents email enumeration attacks while maintaining proper user experience.


74-74: Good practice: Error logging enhances debugging capabilities.

Adding console.error for unexpected errors is a good debugging practice that will help identify issues without exposing sensitive information.

Comment on lines +66 to +70
if (data.user) {
// User was created successfully
console.log("User signed up successfully:", data.user);
// AuthContext will handle navigation based on user onboarding status and role
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove or sanitize console logging to prevent information disclosure.

The console.log statement may expose sensitive user information including email, user ID, and other metadata that could be useful for attackers.

Apply this diff to remove sensitive information logging:

-        console.log("User signed up successfully:", data.user);
+        console.log("User signed up successfully");

Or if logging is needed for debugging, sanitize the output:

-        console.log("User signed up successfully:", data.user);
+        console.log("User signed up successfully:", { id: data.user.id, email: data.user.email });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (data.user) {
// User was created successfully
console.log("User signed up successfully:", data.user);
// AuthContext will handle navigation based on user onboarding status and role
}
if (data.user) {
// User was created successfully
console.log("User signed up successfully");
// AuthContext will handle navigation based on user onboarding status and role
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Frontend/src/pages/Signup.tsx around lines 66 to 70, the console.log
statement outputs sensitive user information which risks information disclosure.
Remove the console.log entirely or replace it with a sanitized log that excludes
sensitive fields like email and user ID, ensuring no private data is exposed in
the console.

@Aditya30ag
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chandansgowda pr generated please review it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG:Security Vulnerability in User Signup
1 participant