100km iaf config: Add parameterisations for tidal dissipation (#562)

[minghangli-uni]

1. Summary:
Ref: #771 (comment)
What has changed?
MOM_input, docs, docs/available_diags.000000, manifests/input.yaml

2. Issues Addressed:

• What should the 100km mom config inherit from 25km / OM4-05? #771 (comment)

3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, model or om3-scripts)

This change requires changes to (note required version where true):

• payu:
• access-om3:
• om3-scripts:

4. Ad-hoc Testing

What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?

5. CI Testing

• !test repro has been run

6. Reproducibility

Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)

• Yes
• No - !test repro commit has been run.

7. Documentation

The docs folder has been updated with output from running the model?

• Yes
• N/A

A PR has been created for updating the documentation?

• Yes:
• N/A

8. Formatting

Changes to MOM_input have been copied from model output in docs/MOM_parameter_docs.short?

• Yes
• N/A

9. Merge Strategy

• Merge commit
• Rebase and merge
• Squash

[minghangli-uni]

Umm, some changes are not consistent with #779 because the iaf config hasnt updated 2ff857c, such as

#Model software version
modules:
    use:
        - /g/data/vk83/modules
    load:
        - access-om3/2025.08.001

[minghangli-uni]

!test repro commit

[github-actions]

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

• 771-tidal-dissipation-parameterisation-iaf (checksums created using commit 125b1d3), against
• dev-MC_100km_jra_iaf (checksums in commit 49e3f9c)

🔧 The new checksums will be committed to this PR, if they differ from what is on this branch.

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om3-configs/125b1d34bea80a6c6b40a366e63c01121cf52c0b, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/runs/50990804041.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/17931890148/artifacts/4077812803.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/49e3f9c0a0162acb313853a5897a3435673db410/testing/checksum

Test summary:
❌ test_repro_historical

[minghangli-uni]

@dougiesquire this is ready for review. Since 2ff857c hasn't been cherry-picked the changes are not consistent with #779

[dougiesquire]

Umm, some changes are not consistent with #779 because the iaf config hasnt updated 2ff857c, such as

#Model software version
modules:
    use:
        - /g/data/vk83/modules
    load:
        - access-om3/2025.08.001

Oh yeah - sorry. Maybe we should wait until @anton-seaice has updated to access-om3/2025.08.001

[dougiesquire]

@minghangli-uni can you rebase this now that #785 is merged and then ping me for approval :)

[minghangli-uni]

!test repro commit

[github-actions]

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

• 771-tidal-dissipation-parameterisation-iaf (checksums created using commit d6e369e), against
• dev-MC_100km_jra_iaf (checksums in commit 429a908)

🔧 The new checksums will be committed to this PR, if they differ from what is on this branch.

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-om3-configs/d6e369ebfe1f9e0afca1cfeaa2bdd6ba994d1d37, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/runs/50998783800.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/actions/runs/17934676092/artifacts/4078680411.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/tree/429a9084b1b3c5b1db869c697c41847a1c2c6563/testing/checksum

Test summary:
❌ test_repro_historical

[dougiesquire]

Thanks @minghangli-uni. I've just pushed some updates to docs/available_diags.000000. It might be cleanest for you to do an interactive rebase and squash those into the "Add parameterisations for tidal dissipation (#562)" commit?

[dougiesquire]

I guess this change was also needed in #779. I'll open a small PR to fix that up now. Sorry for missing this!

[minghangli-uni]

I guess this change was also needed in #779.

I think I've done that in that PR and also this one, but forgot to run it and copy those files after rebase.

[dougiesquire]

Thanks @minghangli-uni!

[minghangli-uni]

I'll bypass and merge this. Thanks @dougiesquire !

[dougiesquire]

I guess this change was also needed in #779.

I think I've done that in that PR and also this one, but forgot to run it and copy those files after rebase.

Just noting that I checked this and yes the changes are already there