CMIP7 forcing update to dev-historical+concentrations#525
Conversation
|
GHG concentrations match those plotted in ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#126, so looks good. |
|
@penguian, @MartinDix, are you happy for me to push the ozone ancillary path changes directly to the branch in this PR? |
|
!test repro commit |
|
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
🔧 The new checksums will be committed to this PR, if they differ from what is on this branch. Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/1e64019a9ab235d97ed9c1d5514e94298c821cf5/testing/checksum Test summary: |
|
@MartinDix, this PR now has the ozone added in, and should be ready for review |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 95e9333 3a79280 into dev-historical+concentrations+CN was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 95e9333 3a79280 into dev-amip+CN was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
1. Summary:
See ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#126 and ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#111
The
CLMCHFCGnamelist inatmosphere/namelistscontains historical greenhouse gas concentrations. It was changed to interpolate concentrations to Jan 1 to match the UM time interpolation.The generated branch is the result of
/scratch/tm70/pcl851/cylc-run/u-dq819.trunk/run93of theu-dq819/trunkCMIP7 ancillary suite. This run also produced the directory/g/data/tm70/pcl851/CMIP7/esm1p6_ancil/2026.03.03which contains updated ancillary and input files includingNOTE: Further changes are needed to this branch before merging. Therefore none of the items 3 to 9 have been fully addressed.
In particular, after the historical ozone file has been copied to its standard location (e.g.)
or similar, the item
in atmosphere/um_env.yaml should be changed to
and line 54
in config.yaml should be updated to
or similar.
2. Issues Addressed:
3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, or model)
This change requires changes to (note pull request(s) where relevant):
4. Ad-hoc Testing
What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?
5. CI Testing
!test reprohas been run6. Reproducibility
Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)
!test repro commithas been run.7. Performance
Has the model performance (say, throughput of model-years/wall-day) changed?
If yes, provide the numbers from your testing. Is the performance better or worse?
8. Manifests
Have you changed the executable, the input files and/or the restart files?
If yes, have you updated the manifests?
To update the manifests, run payu setup (in a cloned copy of your feature branch) with reproducibility tests turned off:
Then commit the newly created manifest files (under manifests/) only to the branch for this PR.
9. Documentation
Is the documentation updated? No
10. Merge Strategy