AMIP: Use aerosols with updated 1849 and 2023 data#355
Conversation
|
!test repro commit |
|
✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅ When comparing:
Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/ac51737208a75387d8c53f972185ff67f441ce51/testing/checksum Test summary: |
1f52434 to
122f14f
Compare
|
!test repro commit |
|
✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅ When comparing:
Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/a30009fc92e65f718d595a5cce63785ccce74006/testing/checksum Test summary: |
|
!cherry-pick 122f14f into dev-amip+CN |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 122f14f into dev-amip+CN was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
1. Summary:
What has changed?
The historical aerosol ancillaries have been updated to use data from the CMIP7 inputs in the boundary years 1849 and 2023. See ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#119
Previously these years used duplicate data from 1850 and 2022.
This PR adds the updated ancillaries to the configuration.
Why was this done?
This change was made for consistency with the CO2 emissions files. The impacts are expected to be minimal, as only aerosol values seen by the model in Jan 1850 and Dec 2022 will be affected.
2. Issues Addressed:
3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, or model)
This change requires changes to (note pull request(s) where relevant):
4. Ad-hoc Testing
What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?
See plots of the total aerosol emissions in ACCESS-NRI/CMIP7-Input#119
5. CI Testing
!test reprohas been run6. Reproducibility
Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)
!test repro commithas been run.As the config starts in 1978, the run will be reproducible at the start. However, answers will change in the final month, December 2022
7. Performance
Has the model performance (say, throughput of model-years/wall-day) changed?
Input files not expected to affect performance
If yes, provide the numbers from your testing. Is the performance better or worse?
8. Manifests
Have you changed the executable, the input files and/or the restart files?
If yes, have you updated the manifests?
To update the manifests, run payu setup (in a cloned copy of your feature branch) with reproducibility tests turned off:
Then commit the newly created manifest files (under manifests/) only to the branch for this PR.
9. Documentation
Is the documentation updated?
10. Merge Strategy