Skip to content

chore: upgrade to protocol v0.14.0#1891

Open
igamigo wants to merge 21 commits intonextfrom
release/v0.14.0-beta
Open

chore: upgrade to protocol v0.14.0#1891
igamigo wants to merge 21 commits intonextfrom
release/v0.14.0-beta

Conversation

@igamigo
Copy link
Collaborator

@igamigo igamigo commented Mar 11, 2026

This PR upgrades protocol to v0.14.

TODO:

  • Add proper description with most notable changes
  • Review changes to see that they comprehensively make sense (we went from protocol version next to 0.14.0-beta.1 to 0.14.0-rc.1 to 0.14.0 quite quickly so a bunch of things accumulated)

@igamigo igamigo force-pushed the release/v0.14.0-beta branch from bd473a1 to ba88a6c Compare March 12, 2026 03:07
@igamigo igamigo force-pushed the release/v0.14.0-beta branch from ba2d82c to 5fb7be3 Compare March 12, 2026 15:13
@igamigo igamigo marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2026 15:59
@greenhat
Copy link
Contributor

Please update the miden-protocol and miden-standard deps to the version used in 0xMiden/node#1784.

@igamigo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

igamigo commented Mar 24, 2026

Please update the miden-protocol and miden-standard deps to the version used in 0xMiden/node#1784.

Currently happening here: #1928
I will pull the update commits here but I'm having trouble adapting some code (though this is mostly solved right now).

EDIT: Now merged back to this branch, Rust integration tests are working but WebClient ones still are not all the way there yet.

igamigo added 3 commits March 24, 2026 14:37
Bring all non-RPC-retry changes (RC bump, integration tests, web-client
updates, CLI fixes, etc.) into the base branch so the PR diff only
shows the RPC retry feature.
@igamigo igamigo changed the title chore: upgrade protocol to beta chore: upgrade to protocol v0.14.0 Mar 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants