-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
Support idxdb on node.js #1598
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Support idxdb on node.js #1598
Conversation
* Ensure wasm * Move to ensure pattern in index * Remove copying static methods * Further move to new pattern in index * copyWebClientStatics * Await wasm in worker * Update changelog * Prettier pass
This reverts commit b753081.
|
Is this mostly in relation to #1437? If so, would you mind outlining the changes that are required for this to work? Mainly looking to understand tradeoffs and see if we have any options (for instance, use a different store implementation for Node) |
Yeah it is. I started working on this and got to a decent point but got distracted.
So its almost there but needs some polish (hence the draft). |
|
I see, so basically what we briefly discussed in the issue.
This is cool if it works well enough, but we already currently logically separate store implementations through the
What stops using native gRPC in node environments? After a quick search there do seem to be a few libraries that do this, but it's possible I'm missing something. In this case too I think we already mostly have the right abstraction (the |
No description provided.