Skip to content

Tier System: x86_64-netbsd #23082

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Tracked by #23665
alexrp opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #23665

Tier System: x86_64-netbsd #23082

alexrp opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
arch-x86_64 64-bit x86 contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. os-netbsd tier system Issues that track the support tier for a platform.
Milestone
0.16.0

Comments

@alexrp
Copy link
Member

alexrp commented Mar 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@alexrp alexrp added arch-x86_64 64-bit x86 enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. os-netbsd tier system Issues that track the support tier for a platform. labels Mar 4, 2025
@alexrp alexrp added this to the 0.16.0 milestone Mar 4, 2025
@alexrp alexrp mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2025
Open
99 tasks
@alexrp alexrp changed the title Tier 1 support for x86_64-netbsd Tier System: x86_64-netbsd Apr 26, 2025
@alexrp alexrp added the contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. label Apr 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
arch-x86_64 64-bit x86 contributor friendly This issue is limited in scope and/or knowledge of Zig internals. enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. os-netbsd tier system Issues that track the support tier for a platform.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.16.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@alexrp