CNCF Sandbox as part of youki

[utam0k]

ref: cncf/sandbox#103 (comment)

[saschagrunert]

+1 let’s get this project in shape for that.

[cgwalters]

I'm not opposed to this, but this crate is also used in multiple places outside of youki too. I wonder about a direct proposal for addition to e.g. https://github.com/opencontainers/ ?

But in the short term, fine by me!

[utam0k]

Thanks for your comments.

I wonder about a direct proposal for addition to e.g. https://github.com/opencontainers/ ?

My proposal for OCI runtime spec was rejected before 😭 However, now would be a good time to re-apply to them. Both, OCI and CNCF are fine for me.

[saschagrunert]

My proposal for OCI runtime spec was rejected before

Do you have a reference to that?

So are we happy to move forward with the CNCF?

[utam0k]

Do you have a reference to that?

This one:
opencontainers/runtime-spec#1106

So are we happy to move forward with the CNCF?

Yes, I believe. Either way, I'm happy to move forward. Also, I believe it's not difficult to donate from CNCF to OCI in the future.

[utam0k]

Apparently it needs to be moved to an independent org.
youki-dev/youki#2962

[saschagrunert]

Apparently it needs to be moved to an independent org. containers/youki#2962

Alright, which one would you prefer or suggest?

[utam0k]

I prefer youki-dev in CNCF project. WDYT?

[saschagrunert]

@utam0k sounds good!

[utam0k]

The transition to youki-dev will take place this Saturday and Sunday in Japan. Please let me know if you have any opinions before then.

[utam0k]

The transition to youki-dev will take place this Saturday and Sunday in Japan. Please let me know if you have any opinions before then.

Done. Organized around permissions. This is because we started using teams. Don't be surprised if you are not surprised.

[utam0k]

I'll publish it in the org announcement.