Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Posterior post-processing for individual mode #415

Closed
lmauviard opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #451
Closed

Posterior post-processing for individual mode #415

lmauviard opened this issue Dec 1, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #451
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request hackweek2024 Issues to be fixed during the 2024 Hack Week postprocessing Issues or updates for postprocessing

Comments

@lmauviard
Copy link
Collaborator

So far, all the posterior post-processing is done by drawing samples from *equal_weight.dat

This can be done on individual posterior modes by getting posterior samples from *post_separate.dat, an output of Multinest when using multi-mode. I suggest to add a possibility to do it in post-processing with a modes parameter when loading runs.

@lmauviard lmauviard added enhancement New feature or request postprocessing Issues or updates for postprocessing hackweek2024 Issues to be fixed during the 2024 Hack Week labels Dec 1, 2024
@yveskini yveskini self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@thjsal
Copy link
Contributor

thjsal commented Dec 11, 2024

The pull request connected to this was not merged yet, so the issue should not be yet closed?

@lmauviard
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ups, wrong manipulation

@lmauviard lmauviard reopened this Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request hackweek2024 Issues to be fixed during the 2024 Hack Week postprocessing Issues or updates for postprocessing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants