Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing metagenome profiles with publicly available profiles from sandpiper #192

Open
adityabandla opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@adityabandla
Copy link

Dear Ben,

I am interested in comparing my metagenomes to a number of samples from the same biome that are publicly available. My comparison would be in the form of beta diversity estimates and the approach would be to (i) pick a subset of markers, (ii) combine otu tables from my metagenomes with the ones from sandpiper, and (iii) calculate beta diversity and check for concordance among markers. Would this approach be valid?

Regards, Adi

@wwood
Copy link
Owner

wwood commented Sep 16, 2024

Hi,
This seems reasonable. One thing to watch for is that only some of the markers target both Bacteria and Archaea - it might be best to stick to these ones. You can tell which is which using singlem metapackage --describe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants