You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For optimal tune_intensity using the InGaAs array detector, it is necessary that I level along 'wa' prior to taking the zeroth moment. The current leveling = true/false toggle in pycmds for tune_intensity does not seem to support this requirement. The gtol and ltol vary between images, but I do not believe this relevant to the demonstration.
If I select level = false in my pycmds tune_intensity acquisition, the output appears to not level along 'wa', nor to level spectrally. This leaves me with a poor dynamic range on the fringes (due to having a high baseline), making peak finding difficult:
If I instead select level = true, I may be leveling along 'wa' (unclear), but I am certainly also leveling along the spectral axis w2=wa, which is a poor choice if I have signal at the edge of my spectral range. Here is a manual example where I level both along 'wa' before taking the zeroth moment, and then select level=true within attune.workup.intensity. You can see data on the left side of the spectral axis that has been paved over by the spectral w2=wm leveling currently intrinsic to attune.workup.intensity. This action is not desirable and obscures real signal.
When I instead manually process my tune_intensity, leveling along 'wa' prior to taking the zeroth moment, and then choosing not to level within attune.workup.intensity, I get what I believe is the optimal output:
It seems to me that the level = true/false options turns all leveling on or off, when some applications require more nuance. Is it possible to add a catagory in the pycmds tune_intensity that allows specificity in type of leveling?
I will place the data, base curve, old curve, and script in here momentarily
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For optimal tune_intensity using the InGaAs array detector, it is necessary that I level along 'wa' prior to taking the zeroth moment. The current leveling = true/false toggle in pycmds for tune_intensity does not seem to support this requirement. The gtol and ltol vary between images, but I do not believe this relevant to the demonstration.
If I select level = false in my pycmds tune_intensity acquisition, the output appears to not level along 'wa', nor to level spectrally. This leaves me with a poor dynamic range on the fringes (due to having a high baseline), making peak finding difficult:
If I instead select level = true, I may be leveling along 'wa' (unclear), but I am certainly also leveling along the spectral axis w2=wa, which is a poor choice if I have signal at the edge of my spectral range. Here is a manual example where I level both along 'wa' before taking the zeroth moment, and then select level=true within attune.workup.intensity. You can see data on the left side of the spectral axis that has been paved over by the spectral w2=wm leveling currently intrinsic to attune.workup.intensity. This action is not desirable and obscures real signal.
When I instead manually process my tune_intensity, leveling along 'wa' prior to taking the zeroth moment, and then choosing not to level within attune.workup.intensity, I get what I believe is the optimal output:
It seems to me that the level = true/false options turns all leveling on or off, when some applications require more nuance. Is it possible to add a catagory in the pycmds tune_intensity that allows specificity in type of leveling?
I will place the data, base curve, old curve, and script in here momentarily
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: