Skip to content

关于论文中Table 15: The results of different methods on motor imagery classification (BCIC-IV-2a, 4-class) #21

@lian0229

Description

@lian0229

这里我在复现时,代码中所给的评估方法是acc, kappa, f1,但是在论文中呈现的是Balanced Accuracy, AUC-PR, AUROC。我也了解过四分类任务中,代码所给的评估方法是合适的。我不清楚是论文中误写还是另有说法。

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions