-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Editor configs #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
+1 But it's not clear to me what they would be using. It doesn't have to be war & peace, but if you're catering to a novice, it's a pretty big assumption to make that they can't install Node, but the IDE is all sorted... |
IMO, if we do that, it doesn't offer that great of a development experience when compared to running flow while typing. Just by at the amount of downloads eslint-linter gets (449,793), you can tell that there's quite a demand for linting on the fly instead of using the CLI.
I agree. I designed the plugin for large scale projects that are already using eslint and want to add flow integration easily. Flow integration doesn't have that much support across editors when compared to eslint. So its a tradeoff of having users of certain editors not have a plugin for their editor and not having full integration (autocompletion). Should we recommend both, with the eslint flow plugin as an alternative if no editor support exists for their editor? |
I absolutely agree with linting as you type being essential. Ohh that makes a lot of sense, you have a good point. Okay so here is the plan:
Sounds good? |
@verekia yup! Agreed |
Actually, let's keep that one open until the Atom chapter is out! |
Created a more specific issue: #148 |
I think it would be great if we could include an editor configuration describing how to setup IDE/text editors for these tools. Proper integration significantly improves developer experience.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: