comparison algorithm for measurement values

[jraman567]

Should we add a comparison routine to each of the CoMID measurement values?

For example, if a verifier wants to compare an SVN with a reference SVN, they would implement the comparison algorithm for SVN as defined in the base CoRIM spec. But this isn't efficient. Instead of each verifier needing to convert the SVN to one of the tagged-svn types and compare the two measurements based on the SVN sub-type (exact-value or min-value), we can do that in the CoRIM repo.

Given each mval type has its comparison algorithm, it'd be best if these types implemented a "Compare" routine that compares it with another mval.

What are your thoughts on this?

[yogeshbdeshpande]

@jraman567 Is this work complete now or more needs to be done?

[joydeep049]

Hello
This issue seems interesting! Can I take this up?
@yogeshbdeshpande @jraman567