Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an option to optionally use custom endpoints and custom models for openai #34

Open
HomeDev68 opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@HomeDev68
Copy link

Add an option to optionally use custom endpoints and custom models for openai for when using providers that support openai schema

@tqer39
Copy link
Owner

tqer39 commented Nov 5, 2024

@HomeDev68 Thank you for contacting us!

I hope to make the following modifications around the weekend.

  1. add an argument to specify the model
  2. fix key name error
    • open-api-key .... .x
    • openai-api-key .... o

@tqer39 tqer39 self-assigned this Nov 5, 2024
@HomeDev68
Copy link
Author

Could you please add support for custom endpoints/ base url for use with openrouter

@tqer39
Copy link
Owner

tqer39 commented Nov 5, 2024

@HomeDev68 I'm sorry for being uninformed, but I'm not sure exactly what the advantages are of changing to which API.

Is the purpose of the issue to improve the functionality of automatic PR generation?
Or is it completely additional functionality?

@HomeDev68
Copy link
Author

@HomeDev68 I'm sorry for being uninformed, but I'm not sure exactly what the advantages are of changing to which API.

Is the purpose of the issue to improve the functionality of automatic PR generation? Or is it completely additional functionality?

I mean for users to have a choice to use the models through a cheaper source like Openrouter. It is an additional functionality that will improve it, because I use openai models through openrouter since it is cheaper while some people prefer to use it through openai directly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants