You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Encountered this while running on a jetson AGX orin device (sm_87 arch), from looking at the source code a bit it seems like each capability needs to be explicitly accounted for?
$ nvidia-device-query
CUDA device query (Driver API, statically linked)
CUDA driver version 11.4
CUDA API version 11.4
Detected 1 CUDA capable device
Device 0: Orin
*** Warning: Unknown CUDA device compute capability: 8.7
*** Please submit a bug report at https://github.com/tmcdonell/cuda/issues
CUDA capability: 8.7
CUDA cores: 1024 cores in 16 multiprocessors (64 cores/MP)
Global memory: 61 GB
Constant memory: 64 kB
Shared memory per block: 48 kB
Registers per block: 65536
Warp size: 32
Maximum threads per multiprocessor: 1536
Maximum threads per block: 1024
Maximum grid dimensions: 2147483647 x 65535 x 65535
Maximum block dimensions: 1024 x 1024 x 64
GPU clock rate: 1.3 GHz
Memory clock rate: 1.3 GHz
Memory bus width: 128-bit
L2 cache size: 4 MB
Maximum texture dimensions
1D: 131072
2D: 131072 x 65536
3D: 16384 x 16384 x 16384
Texture alignment: 512 B
Maximum memory pitch: 2 GB
Concurrent kernel execution: Yes
Concurrent copy and execution: Yes, with 2 copy engines
Runtime limit on kernel execution: No
Integrated GPU sharing host memory: Yes
Host page-locked memory mapping: Yes
ECC memory support: No
Unified addressing (UVA): Yes
Single to double precision performance: 32 : 1
Supports compute pre-emption: Yes
Supports cooperative launch: Yes
Supports multi-device cooperative launch: Yes
PCI bus/location: 0/0
Compute mode: Default
Multiple contexts are allowed on the device simultaneously
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the great project :)
Encountered this while running on a jetson AGX orin device (sm_87 arch), from looking at the source code a bit it seems like each capability needs to be explicitly accounted for?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: