Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

examples/gemm/regression_example_gemm.py (2)

81-85: 💤 Low value

Consider pre-building a lookup dict if _BENCH_GEMM_CASES grows.

The current O(n) linear search is fine for 9 cases, but if the benchmark suite expands significantly, converting _BENCH_GEMM_CASES to a dict keyed by name would give O(1) lookup.

♻️ Optional refactor to dict-based lookup

-_BENCH_GEMM_CASES = (
+_BENCH_GEMM_CASES = {
+    "bench_gemm_m1664_n1024_k262144": {"name": "bench_gemm_m1664_n1024_k262144", "M": 1664, "N": 1024, "K": 262144},
-    {"name": "bench_gemm_m1664_n1024_k262144", "M": 1664, "N": 1024, "K": 262144},
     # ... (repeat for all cases)
-)
+}

 def _get_bench_gemm_case(name):
-    for case in _BENCH_GEMM_CASES:
-        if case["name"] == name:
-            return case
-    raise KeyError(f"unknown GEMM benchmark case: {name}")
+    if name not in _BENCH_GEMM_CASES:
+        raise KeyError(f"unknown GEMM benchmark case: {name}")
+    return _BENCH_GEMM_CASES[name]

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@examples/gemm/regression_example_gemm.py` around lines 81 - 85, The linear
search in _get_bench_gemm_case over _BENCH_GEMM_CASES should be replaced with an
O(1) lookup: build a dict mapping case["name"] to the case (e.g.,
_BENCH_GEMM_CASES_BY_NAME) at module load time and have
_get_bench_gemm_case(name) return _BENCH_GEMM_CASES_BY_NAME[name] (raising
KeyError if missing); update any code that mutates or constructs
_BENCH_GEMM_CASES to keep the dict in sync or construct the dict from the list
once to avoid repeat scans.

---

88-121: ⚖️ Poor tradeoff

Optional: Derive case name from wrapper function name to reduce string repetition.

All nine wrappers follow the pattern regression_bench_gemm_* → bench_gemm_*. You could eliminate the hard-coded case name strings by deriving them from the function's own __name__:

def regression_bench_gemm_m1664_n1024_k262144():
    import sys
    fn_name = sys._getframe().f_code.co_name
    case_name = fn_name.replace("regression_", "", 1)
    _process_bench_gemm_case(_get_bench_gemm_case(case_name))

This eliminates typo risk and enforces the naming convention. However, the current explicit approach is more readable and grep-friendly, so this is purely optional.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@examples/gemm/regression_example_gemm.py` around lines 88 - 121, Nine wrapper
functions repeat the bench case string; change each regression_bench_gemm_*
wrapper to derive the case name from the function's own name (fn_name =
sys._getframe().f_code.co_name or equivalent) by stripping the "regression_"
prefix and pass that derived case_name into _get_bench_gemm_case and then to
_process_bench_gemm_case to remove hard-coded strings while keeping behavior of
functions like regression_bench_gemm_m1664_n1024_k262144 and the helpers
_get_bench_gemm_case/_process_bench_gemm_case unchanged.