A few Pocket data improvement PRs for review + energy symbols issue #764
Unanswered
TCGdexBOT
asked this question in
Help & Support
Replies: 6 comments
|
💬 avior on Discord wrote: Hey, I am in progress of reviewing your PRs ! |
0 replies
|
💬 khal_3457 on Discord wrote: Thanks for getting these merged <@223823847508410368>
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
💬 khal_3457 on Discord wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, wasn’t sure the best place to post this. Hope here is ok?
I noticed some data issues with various Pocket cards, mainly Triumphant Light and Shining Revelry, so I’ve written up a couple of PRs to address these:
Would anyone be able to review these?
I also have a PR to add all the missing Promo cards added over the last two sets:
These 3 PRs all ready for review but I was unable to move them on the project board. Just flagging here in-case they may have been missed.
—-
Additionally, I’ve noticed there are inconsistencies in how we represent energy icons throughout the dataset, I have raised an issue here suggesting a possible solution to standardise this, but open to discussion.
#697
I’ve drafted a PR (#699) of what this might look like standardised for all Pocket cards, but I’m not familiar with the full dataset so unsure if this would be reasonable globally?
Would appreciate any feedback on these, cheers
All reactions