You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PeerJ wants us to confirm participation in open peer review. I'm assuming we do, since the history is already published in this repo anyway. Please let me know by the end of the week if you have any objections. Here is the information they sent me.
Can you please confirm whether you and your co-authors are happy for us to publish the peer review history alongside the manuscript at this time? There is no extra charge for this service and no further work is required from you to include it.
The peer review history consists of all the reviewers’ comments from each iteration, including the reviewers’ names where they have agreed to reveal their names; all previous versions of the manuscripts; all the responses to reviewers. Including the peer review history increases engagement and views, and has been cited as a helpful learning tool regardless of how the process went. It's also been well received as a demonstration that your article went through a rigorous peer review process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PeerJ wants us to confirm participation in open peer review. I'm assuming we do, since the history is already published in this repo anyway. Please let me know by the end of the week if you have any objections. Here is the information they sent me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: