[Other]: Automatically adding attribution

[joeinnes]

Details

Attribution was automatically enabled without my consent or information. I would suggest you reconsider enabling this automatically.

Maybe you could prompt users before doing this?

[thenomadcode]

Yeah I completely agree.
I love orca. I use it everyday and you guys did a fantastic job with it. But about this attribution thing :

• Orca is a tool, it does not produce any code. Seeing claude code trying to take credit for stuff was already annoying, but at least Claude code was generating the code. Orca is a tool/IDE and manage worktrees. For me it is like if VSCode, Jetbrains, or vim would like to take credit for PRs. I find this is a trend that should not exist, specifically in opensource. What is the next step will Next.js or bun take credit on my PRs ? Why not ghostty or macOs itself ? After all I used them to develop also ! Or maybe on every PR, let's list all the entire stack of every tool I used to make that code.... You see that it is not sustainable.
• Seems like advertising to me for no reason. That made me look bad in an enterprise environment.
• I never have been asked for consent for this. The default should have been no, at least for existing installation. If the user install Orca for the first time, that could be on by default. Not silently forcing user to a parasite behaviour.
• Also if just create a wortree, open vscode in it, code myself, then use a terminal from orca to manually create a PR with some git and gh commands, it will add the message.
• If I call the gh command in an orca terminal, I think I am calling this command but in fact I am calling a binary shim, which will modify my initial command before calling the real gh command. This is a trust issue for me. When I type a command, the contract is that this command should be called, not something else.