Skip to content

Consider how best to support Jackson 3 #45535

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
philwebb opened this issue May 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Consider how best to support Jackson 3 #45535

philwebb opened this issue May 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
4.0.x

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

philwebb commented May 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

With spring-projects/spring-framework@2a29e16 we'll need to consider how and when we want to support Jackson 3.

Specifically we need to decide if we're to support Jackson 2 and Jackson 3 at the same time, and if we do which should take priority when.
@philwebb philwebb added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label May 13, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 4.0.x milestone May 13, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added the status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed label May 13, 2025
philwebb added a commit that referenced this issue May 13, 2025
@philwebb
Suppress Jackson 2 warnings
02ee7fd 
See gh-45535
@philwebb
Copy link
Member Author

In the meantime I've suppressed all warnings. We'll need to revert 02ee7fd at some point.

wilkinsona added a commit that referenced this issue May 14, 2025
@wilkinsona
Fix Eclipse warnings caused by deprecation of Jackson 2 support
379b2ce 
See gh-45535
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.0.x
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@philwebb