Skip to content

Extract command fails when using jar mode tools from an unpacked jar #43294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wilkinsona opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Milestone

Comments

@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

If you unpack an uber jar and then run the extract command from jar mode tools, it fails:

$ java -Djarmode=tools org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher extract
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:118)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:102)
	at org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:64)
	at org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher.main(JarLauncher.java:40)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Manifest attribute 'Spring-Boot-Classpath-Index' is mandatory
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.ToolsJarMode.run(ToolsJarMode.java:56)
	at org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarModeRunner.main(JarModeRunner.java:43)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
	... 4 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Manifest attribute 'Spring-Boot-Classpath-Index' is mandatory
	at org.springframework.util.Assert.state(Assert.java:79)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.IndexedJarStructure.getMandatoryAttribute(IndexedJarStructure.java:137)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.IndexedJarStructure.get(IndexedJarStructure.java:145)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.ExtractCommand.getJarStructure(ExtractCommand.java:214)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.ExtractCommand.run(ExtractCommand.java:113)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.Command.run(Command.java:112)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.Runner.runCommand(Runner.java:68)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.Runner.run(Runner.java:55)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.Runner.run(Runner.java:47)
	at org.springframework.boot.jarmode.tools.ToolsJarMode.run(ToolsJarMode.java:53)
	... 6 more

It would be beneficial for buildpacks if this worked as it would mean that they don't have to zip things back up again.

/cc @anthonydahanne

@wilkinsona wilkinsona added the type: bug A general bug label Nov 26, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added this to the 3.3.x milestone Nov 26, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Nov 26, 2024
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member Author

wilkinsona commented Nov 26, 2024

This is quite a bit more complicated than I'd hoped as it affects how the extract command and its options can be used.

  --destination string           Directory to extract files to. Defaults to a directory named after the uber JAR (without the file extension)

The default no longer works. With an unpacked uber JAR, it's likely that there's already no file extension so you end up with an destination directory that's the same as the input directory which fails as it already exists and isn't empty.

  --application-filename string  Name of the application JAR file. Only applicable when not using --launcher. Defaults to the uber JAR filename

This default also doesn't work. With an unpacked uber JAR, it's likely that there's no file extension so you end up with a jar file that doesn't end with .jar.

Running the extract command against an already unpacked uber jar is something of an edge case – buildpacks may be the only potential users – so I don't think we should expand/change options' descriptions and defaults to describe the situation. Perhaps we could require buildpacks to always specify both --destination and --application-filename instead? I'd like to discuss our options with the team as I'm not sure that the breadth of the changes is worth it and the least bad option may well be to require buildpacks to zip things back up again before running extract.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona removed their assignment Nov 26, 2024
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added the for: team-meeting An issue we'd like to discuss as a team to make progress label Nov 26, 2024
@philwebb
Copy link
Member

philwebb commented Dec 2, 2024

Perhaps for --application-filename we could add .jar automatically if the source is a directory. For --destination I think we could fail hard if one isn't specified and the source is a directory.

@philwebb philwebb changed the title extract command fails when using jar mode tools from an unpacked jar Extract command fails when using jar mode tools from an unpacked jar Dec 18, 2024
@philwebb philwebb self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
@philwebb
Copy link
Member

I've started looking at this and there are also some issues with our Context object. It's finding the incorrect jar when running exploded.

@philwebb philwebb removed the for: team-meeting An issue we'd like to discuss as a team to make progress label Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants