-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 307
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[content] Improve documentation on deferStream
#987
Comments
also missing in the docs search is RouteDefinition as in
|
@mileung I'm not entirely sure what the issue is. If you’re referring to the fact that searching for "deferStream" in the site’s search bar doesn’t display the items you mentioned, that is intentional. We do not include code blocks in the search results to avoid cluttering them. I will go ahead and close this issue. However, if I misunderstood anything, please feel free to reopen it. |
I thought it would be appropriate for a related link like this to show up when you search for deferStream. |
Oh, that's a problem. We will address it soon. |
deferStream
Imho, the solution should be as simple as adding proper documentation to |
@atilafassina IMHO, the reference page is the proper place to document I propose a structural change, shifting from a table format to this layout: ## Options
### `deferStream`
**Type:** `boolean`
Description... This change should resolve the current issue and also provide an opportunity to include additional information about a prop or option, such as examples that couldn't be housed in a table format. |
as in
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: