fix(conflicts): test coverage for resolution strategies (#865) - #903

• Add a verification note indicating conflict resolution strategy tests were validated (#865).
• No production code changes; test module behavior remains unchanged.

The current approach is appropriate for a trivial, non-functional change; no alternative implementation is warranted.

Documentation (1) +2 / -0

test_conflicts.pyAdd verification comment for resolution strategy tests +2/-0

Add verification comment for resolution strategy tests

• Appends a comment noting the conflict resolution strategy test suite was verified for issue #865. No test logic or assertions were modified.

tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py

Description

The PR does not add/extend tests to cover credibility_weighted, first_seen, and the
manual_review/expert_review behaviors, despite claiming verified coverage. This leaves key
resolution strategies unvalidated and risks silent regressions.

Code

tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[245]

+# Verified and validated test suite for resolution strategies (#865)

Evidence

PR Compliance ID 1 requires explicit tests for the listed strategies. The current resolver test only
exercises voting, most_recent, and highest_confidence, while the resolver implementation
supports additional strategies (credibility_weighted, first_seen, manual_review,
expert_review) that are not asserted anywhere in tests.

Add test coverage for untested conflict resolution strategies in semantica/conflicts
tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[142-185]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_resolver.py[181-243]
tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[245-245]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The compliance checklist requires tests for `credibility_weighted`, `first_seen`, and `manual_review`/`expert_review` strategies, but `tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py` only tests `voting`, `most_recent`, and `highest_confidence`.
## Issue Context
`ConflictResolver.resolve_conflict()` supports these strategies and includes special flagging behavior for `manual_review`/`expert_review` via metadata fields; these paths are currently untested.
## Fix Focus Areas
- tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[142-185]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_resolver.py[181-243]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_resolver.py[385-536]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Description

The PR does not add tests for detect_relationship_conflicts() and detect_temporal_conflicts();
detect_logical_conflicts() also exists but is untested. This risks missed conflict signals during
knowledge graph builds.

Code

tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[245]

+# Verified and validated test suite for resolution strategies (#865)

Evidence

PR Compliance ID 2 requires tests for relationship and temporal conflict detection and mandates
coverage for logical conflict detection if it exists. The current tests only call
detect_value_conflicts() and detect_type_conflicts(), while the codebase includes
detect_relationship_conflicts(), detect_temporal_conflicts(), and detect_logical_conflicts()
implementations that remain untested.

Add test coverage for untested conflict detection methods in semantica/conflicts
tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[111-141]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[339-440]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[818-910]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[1025-1054]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
Required conflict detection methods (`detect_relationship_conflicts()`, `detect_temporal_conflicts()`, and existing `detect_logical_conflicts()`) are not covered by automated tests.
## Issue Context
`tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py` currently tests only `detect_value_conflicts()` and `detect_type_conflicts()`, but the detector implements additional detection modes that should be validated with constructed conflicting inputs.
## Fix Focus Areas
- tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[111-141]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[339-440]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[818-910]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_detector.py[1025-1054]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

Description

The PR does not add assertions for analyzer by_source breakdown outputs or any test executing
temporal trend analysis (analyze_trends). This leaves reporting/diagnostics paths unvalidated.

Code

tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[245]

+# Verified and validated test suite for resolution strategies (#865)

Evidence

PR Compliance ID 3 requires tests that assert meaningful by_source outputs and execute temporal
trend analysis. The current analyzer test does not check by_source, and there are no tests
invoking ConflictAnalyzer.analyze_trends() despite the implementation being present.

Add test coverage for untested analyzer paths (by_source and temporal trend analysis)
tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[186-216]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_analyzer.py[162-216]
semantica/conflicts/conflict_analyzer.py[521-600]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
Analyzer paths for `by_source` breakdown and temporal trend analysis are not covered by tests.
## Issue Context
`ConflictAnalyzer.analyze_conflicts()` computes a `by_source` section and the module also provides `analyze_trends()` for temporal trend analysis, but `tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py` only asserts `total_conflicts` and `by_severity`.
## Fix Focus Areas
- tests/conflicts/test_conflicts.py[186-216]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_analyzer.py[162-216]
- semantica/conflicts/conflict_analyzer.py[521-600]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

💡 Did you know, you can group findings by type and pick your Finding display, from Minimal to Full

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗