-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
Tracking Issue for osstr_split_at #156199
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCS-tracking-unimplementedStatus: The feature has not been implemented.Status: The feature has not been implemented.T-libs-apiRelevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-tracking-issueCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCCategory: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFCS-tracking-unimplementedStatus: The feature has not been implemented.Status: The feature has not been implemented.T-libs-apiRelevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Feature gate:
#![feature(osstr_split_at)]This is a tracking issue for
OsStr::{split_at, split_at_checked}.This allows splitting
OsStron a valid UTF-8 boundary cross-platform.Public API
Steps / History
(Remember to update the
S-tracking-*label when checking boxes.)OsStr::{split_at, split_at_checked}libs-team#780Unresolved Questions
OsStris just bytes (e.g. Unix), should it allow splitting at arbitrary indexes? However, this would mean that you could safely write non-portable code usingOsStr.Footnotes
https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/stabilization.html ↩