Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Categorization: usergroups & conferences #96

Open
1000miles opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Categorization: usergroups & conferences #96

1000miles opened this issue May 16, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@1000miles
Copy link
Collaborator

1000miles commented May 16, 2016

@PragTob
cc @lauralindal @hagenburger @skade

Hey there, what is the purpose of these categories

usergroups
conferences

in the supporters.json when they are finally not displayed on the website? As far as I can see we currently don't have a proper order, right? Should we fix this?

@skade skade self-assigned this Sep 10, 2017
@1000miles
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@skade If you work on this ticket, could also please take care of ticket #43? So the categorization/sorting can be done in a row? :)

@PragTob
Copy link
Member

PragTob commented Sep 11, 2017

Actually not sure when/how this got introduced 😅

Hm was already in the very first commit by @hagenburger - 21671e4

I guess separating them in the view would be nice but not super duper needed :)

@hagenburger
Copy link
Member

We expected the list to grow (as it did) and this would have been a possibility to split up the list.

@hagenburger
Copy link
Member

As it might be confusing where to put new user groups/conferences (our JSON file is big), I suggest splitting up supporters.json into usergroups.json and conferences.json and simplify the JSON structure. Otherwise people might just add their user group at the end of the file which might result being listed as a conference later on.

@1000miles
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks, I am voting for yes. :)

Referencing the request for organisations as well: (#43)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants