Does anyone know why parameters of C8C1I increases?

[TrilSiaWalt]

Does anyone know why parameters of C8C1I increases?
I try to mainly modify the config as

    "upsample_rates": [8, 1],
    "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16, 15],

or

    "upsample_rates": [8, 1],
    "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16, 1],

but neither of their parameters changed as shown in the table.

[SynthAether]

inspecting what you are trying to do, it should be more like:

"upsample_rates": [8,1], "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16,2],

though that alone won't be enough, you also need to update the iSTFT parameters gen_istft_n_fft and gen_istft_hop_size so you get perfect upsampling to 256 samples per frame

[TrilSiaWalt]

inspecting what you are trying to do, it should be more like:

"upsample_rates": [8,1], "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16,2],

though that alone won't be enough, you also need to update the iSTFT parameters gen_istft_n_fft and gen_istft_hop_size so you get perfect upsampling to 256 samples per frame

had done that. you can see that C8I also need it but it doesn't increase the parameters.

[NorthhhFishSoup]

they give reason in iSTFTNet2 paper：

Param of iSTFTNet-C8C1I32 is larger than that of iSTFTNetC8C8I4 because the number of channels is halved in the second 1D ResBlocks in iSTFTNet-C8C8I4, whereas it is not conducted in iSTFTNet-C8C1I32 owing to the absence of temporal upsampling. We used this strategy to confirm whether iSTFTNet-C8C1I32 could not obtain comparable speech quality, even with expressive modules.