This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 12, 2020. It is now read-only.

Allow passing SutState directly to executeAction(...) #11

Closed

beatngu13 opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 1 comment

Labels

Contributor

beatngu13 commented Dec 20, 2018

Instead of doing the following on the client side:

SutState beforeState = ...
Action action = ...
SutState afterState = ...
Set<Action> unexploredActions = ...
final State state = stateMachine.getState( beforeState, unexploredActions );
stateMachine.executeAction( state, action, afterState, unexploredActions );

Could we pass SutState directly?

SutState beforeState = ...
Action action = ...
SutState afterState = ...
Set<Action> unexploredActions = ...
stateMachine.executeAction( beforeState, action, afterState, unexploredActions );

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

beatngu13 added the enhancement label

Contributor

tdauth commented Dec 24, 2018

Done, see cc01245

tdauth closed this as completed

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.