From c2e3bf30b34f07c41278e7d92d67387b26550b13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tamino Dauth <tamino@cdauth.eu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:07:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix hashCode test with latest model snapshop

---
 .../guistatemachine/api/impl/GuiStateMachineImplSpec.scala     | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/test/scala/de/retest/guistatemachine/api/impl/GuiStateMachineImplSpec.scala b/src/test/scala/de/retest/guistatemachine/api/impl/GuiStateMachineImplSpec.scala
index b9fcf0d..1e78180 100644
--- a/src/test/scala/de/retest/guistatemachine/api/impl/GuiStateMachineImplSpec.scala
+++ b/src/test/scala/de/retest/guistatemachine/api/impl/GuiStateMachineImplSpec.scala
@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ class GuiStateMachineImplSpec extends AbstractApiSpec with BeforeAndAfterEach {
       s0.equals(s0Equal) shouldBe true
       s0.hashCode() shouldEqual s0Equal.hashCode()
       differentState.equals(s0) shouldBe false
-      // TODO There is a bug in the current retest-model. The hashCode is not calculated considering the contained components.
-      //differentState.hashCode() should not equal s0.hashCode()
+      differentState.hashCode() should not equal s0.hashCode()
       sut.getAllStates.size shouldEqual 0
       sut.getState(s0)
       sut.getAllStates.size shouldEqual 1