Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compute Fasta v Fasta ANI as opposed to all-v-all #18

Open
CarsonJM opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Compute Fasta v Fasta ANI as opposed to all-v-all #18

CarsonJM opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@CarsonJM
Copy link

Thanks for the great tool!

Currently, vClust only allows users to compute all-v-all ANI. While this is very useful for clustering, there are also instances where this is not necessary and a query v reference approach would be more efficient.

For example, if I assemble viral sequences and am interested in quickly comparing them to a public database (i.e. IMG/VR) to assess novelty, it would be much faster to align only my query sequences to IMG/VR rather than performing an all-v-all alignment.

Is this something vClust is already capable of, or something that is planned for the future?

@aziele aziele added the feature request New feature or request label Dec 23, 2024
@aziele aziele self-assigned this Dec 23, 2024
@aziele
Copy link
Contributor

aziele commented Dec 23, 2024

Thank you for your feedback and for using Vclust!

Currently, Vclust supports only all-vs-all ANI comparisons. However, we recognize the need for a FASTA-vs-FASTA approach—it's a feature we've needed ourselves many times. We've already started working on this functionality, beginning with the prefilter step, and will subsequently update the align step to support it. We'll share updates as soon as the feature becomes available, though we can’t provide an estimated time for its release.

@CarsonJM
Copy link
Author

CarsonJM commented Dec 23, 2024

Fantastic, thank you for the timely reply and information!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants