You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd love to see an addition to pairing bot where you can restrict matches to specific programming languages. I was going to look into making a pull request for this, but unfortunately I don't know any Go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Kelly! Thanks for the suggestion!
When I first made pairing bot, I didn't want to include this feature
because I thought the added complexity might decrease engagement. Also, it
significantly increases the complexity of the matching algorithm, and
that's not the sort of problem that I find very fun.
That being said, I'm not opposed to adding it if someone else comes up with
a matching algorithm for it! A good algorithm for this would need to have a
non-exclusive preference for matching people based on language (since
otherwise the same two people may get matched every single day if they are
the only two people who've listed that language preference).I *think* this
means that pairing bot would need to start remembering historical matches,
which she doesn't currently do. So it's a big change.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:04 AM Kelly Foulk ***@***.***> wrote:
I'd love to see an addition to pairing bot where you can restrict matches
to specific programming languages. I was going to look into making a pull
request for this, but unfortunately I don't know any Go.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJILHU2GZJJQWZMPXUY6GVTTLAPWZANCNFSM43XIRYOQ>
.
I'd love to see an addition to pairing bot where you can restrict matches to specific programming languages. I was going to look into making a pull request for this, but unfortunately I don't know any Go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: