Communication Data Licensing

[pchainho]

Actors

Pre-conditions

Description

Data and Media shared in H2H (including human voice and image) and M2M communication is subject to "copyright" licences like creative commons used to rule access control to data.
For example, the licence only allows shared data and media including spoken words and messages to be available to involved parties. Other example could give the power to fully control shared data and media (eg after the communication is over I can delete my recorded voice or I can set who can hear it) by their authors. The copyright licence would be agreed among participants per conversation.

In addition, shared media and data can also be subject to legal policies in these shared resources

Differentiation - Market Relevance

New concept?

[rebecca-copeland]

There are a lot of legal issues here - privacy, human rights and data
protection laws in each country may not agree with each other. Even if you
were a participant in a call, it does not mean that you can decide who else
can hear it, or even keep records that may fall into others' hands. Do you
really want to go down this path?

My Best

Rebecca

On 10 March 2015 at 17:57, pchainho notifications@github.com wrote:

Actors Pre-conditions Description

Data and Media shared in H2H (including human voice and image) and M2M
communication is subject to "copyright" licences like creative commons used
to rule access control to data.
For example, the licence only allows shared data and media including
spoken words and messages to be available to involved parties. Other
example could give the power to fully control shared data and media (eg
after the communication is over I can delete my recorded voice or I can set
who can hear it) by their authors. The copyright licence would be agreed
among participants per conversation.

In addition, shared media and data can also be subject to legal policies
in these shared resources
Differentiation - Market Relevance

New concept?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#98.

[Yudani]

I do agree with Rebecca to keep this out of the scope. We can foresee a Copyright Service Provider that we can use to validate if something is legal or not, but there is a lot of fragmentation on this due to national regulations.
In any case, if we think that might be relevant, Quobis can make a research on the state of the art to decide the best strategy.

[pchainho]

I agree this Use Case is associated with lots of legal issues but the EC is investing a lot on the harmonization of copyright laws to promote the "single digital market" and I believe that's the way to go.

At this point I'm proposing to have this use case for the 2nd phase but I would be interested to know more about your ideas