Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Feel free to open a PR with a fix |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Both operators provide a multi-arch image, you can review that here: https://hub.docker.com/r/rabbitmqoperator/messaging-topology-operator/tags We never intended for others to consume our kustomize files. The fact that we still use kustomize is due to my lack of time to migrate everything to YTT. I recommend that you consume our regular manifest files, available in the github releases: https://github.com/rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator/releases If you are very determined to use our kustomize files, I will recommend to read our Makefile, to understand how we render the manifests with different images: https://github.com/rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator/blob/main/Makefile#L236-L244 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the bug
while trying to install RabbitMQ on ARM, one of the containers is not running since is pointing to an image that does not have ARM version.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
kustomization.yaml
with below content:Expected behavior
Pod running on ARM architecture
Screenshots
With above code a X86 image is deployed, since is pointing to https://github.com/rabbitmq/messaging-topology-operator/blob/main/config/default/base/kustomization.yaml#L18
which using an old image updated more than 2 years ago https://hub.docker.com/r/rabbitmqoperator/messaging-topology-operator-dev/tags
Version and environment information
Additional context
I believe the code needs to be updated to point to https://hub.docker.com/r/rabbitmqoperator/messaging-topology-operator instead of https://hub.docker.com/r/rabbitmqoperator/messaging-topology-operator-dev/tags
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions