Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
The current implementation is optimized for concurrent transactions, which is not supported with in-memory SQLite databases. We could expose the same API without concurrency with an in-memory database, but that would require some work. Can investigate that for a future release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, thank you for your great library.
I am really happy because I was looking for a library that would manage Isolate and allow concurrent transactions.
Anyway, I often use in-memory databases for unit testing. I think it will be useful for many people.
The sqlite3 library has a method
sqlite3.openInMemory()
available; the SqliteDatabase class in sqlite_async does not appear to have such an option.Please let me know if I am just missing something that is already implemented.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions