Currently, medical history is stored as an optional field, like tags.
I think tags are meant to be short and convey some important information succinctly.
A patient's medical history would likely contain a lot of information which cannot be properly conveyed in a few short words, like a tag can.
Thus, I think information that can be condensed into short terms like blood-type are well suited for the target audience, but information that is difficult to condense like medical history should probably not be included as a field of information alongside it.
An alternative may be to have a feature to allow for attaching PDF files of a patient's medical documents to their contacts, and a command to open them.
Another might be to drop the "retrieving patient information part" altogether, since patient information is likely too lengthy to be typed in manually and focus more on the assigning nurses and scheduling checkups.
Currently, medical history is stored as an optional field, like tags.
I think tags are meant to be short and convey some important information succinctly.
A patient's medical history would likely contain a lot of information which cannot be properly conveyed in a few short words, like a tag can.
Thus, I think information that can be condensed into short terms like blood-type are well suited for the target audience, but information that is difficult to condense like medical history should probably not be included as a field of information alongside it.
An alternative may be to have a feature to allow for attaching PDF files of a patient's medical documents to their contacts, and a command to open them.
Another might be to drop the "retrieving patient information part" altogether, since patient information is likely too lengthy to be typed in manually and focus more on the assigning nurses and scheduling checkups.