Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistency between prediction and VALID_HTML_TOKEN #18

Open
ygzhu opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consistency between prediction and VALID_HTML_TOKEN #18

ygzhu opened this issue Jul 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ygzhu
Copy link

ygzhu commented Jul 1, 2024

Thanks for your contributions! I noticed that the VALID_HTML_TOKEN is composed of [""] and HTML_TOKENS in constant.py. VALID_HTML_TOKEN is used to filter the prediction during inference phase. But the annotation of "[" and "]" are not included in VALID_HTML_TOKEN. Does this omission affect the final prediction during the inference phase?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant